Justice, Algorithm and Missing Remedies: SC’s Draft AI Regulations

This piece examines the Supreme Court’s Draft Regulations on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026, and highlights a significant gap in the proposed framework. While the Draft Regulations govern the use of AI in courts, they do not provide a dedicated remedy for harms caused by the authorised use of AI. Looking at global best practices, it is argued that the Regulations should include a right to explanation and a dedicated grievance redressal mechanism to promote accountability, transparency, and public confidence in the justice system. Continue reading Justice, Algorithm and Missing Remedies: SC’s Draft AI Regulations

AI Voice Cloning in India: Rethinking Legal Frameworks Through a Harms-Based Lens

In this blog post, the author examines the emerging legal challenges posed by AI voice cloning in India and argues that existing legal frameworks remain fragmented and inadequate to address the diverse harms caused by synthetic voice technologies. Through a harms-based lens, the article analyses how unauthorised voice replication can result in reputational, economic, psychological, and democratic harms that are not fully captured by current protections under Indian law. The author argues that India’s fragmented legal framework creates uncertainty and advocates for a dedicated regulatory framework with stronger protections for vocal identity, clearer consent standards, and greater accountability to balance technological innovation with individual rights. Continue reading AI Voice Cloning in India: Rethinking Legal Frameworks Through a Harms-Based Lens