12th RMLNLU International Legal Essay Writing Competition Winning Entries

The Journal Committee at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, in collaboration with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, organised the 12th edition of the RMLNLU International Legal Essay Writing Competition. Along with that, the RMLNLU – Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Conference on Insolvency Law was also held on 22 March 2025. This year, the Committee invited submissions from authors on Insolvency Law. The sub-themes for the … Continue reading 12th RMLNLU International Legal Essay Writing Competition Winning Entries

Economic Justifications of SSEs: SEBI’s Regulatory Amendments and Their Impact on NPOs

The author of the article is analyzing the economic justifications for Social Stock Exchanges (SSEs) in India, particularly in light of recent regulatory amendments proposed by the SEBI. The article explores the role of SSEs in facilitating social enterprises, such as non-profit organizations (NPOs), in raising funds by offering a platform for social impact investment. The author uses an economic and legal framework to investigate the efficiency and effectiveness of SSEs in addressing agency problems, transaction costs, and information asymmetry between investors and social enterprises. The author delves into SEBI’s proposed amendments, such as mandatory disclosures and expanded registration criteria for NPOs, which aim to increase market transparency and attract more investors. However, the article also discusses the potential drawbacks of these amendments, particularly the increased operational costs for NPOs due to stringent disclosure requirements, which could reduce the net benefits of SSE participation. The article highlights the need for a delicate balance between ensuring transparency and minimizing transaction costs to maintain market efficiency and the long-term success of SSEs.
Continue reading Economic Justifications of SSEs: SEBI’s Regulatory Amendments and Their Impact on NPOs

12th RMLNLU International Legal Essay Competition and Conference on Insolvency Law (RILEC), being organized on 22 March, 2025 in collaboration with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan.

The Journal Committee (“Committee”) at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow (“RMLNLU”), in collaboration with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, is organizing the 12th edition of the RMLNLU International Legal Essay Competition and Conference on Insolvency Law (“RILEC”). The Conference is to be conducted on 22nd March, 2025.   About the Event Pursuant to the Call for Papers released in July 2024, the Committee received … Continue reading 12th RMLNLU International Legal Essay Competition and Conference on Insolvency Law (RILEC), being organized on 22 March, 2025 in collaboration with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan.

Protecting the Code of Life: Reimagining Data Privacy in the Age of Gene Editing

The article explores the challenges of regulating genetic data in the era of CRISPR gene-editing technology. It critically examines India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) and its shortcomings in safeguarding genetic information. A major concern highlighted is the lack of specific protection for genetic data under the DPDPA. Unlike conventional personal data, genetic information is inherently sensitive and has far-reaching implications beyond the individual. It is relational in nature, meaning it also affects biological relatives and future generations. However, the Act does not classify genetic data separately, failing to provide the heightened security it demands. Another critical issue is the ineffectiveness of traditional anonymization techniques for genetic data. Since genetic sequences are unique and identifiable, even anonymized genetic data can often be traced back to individuals. To address this, the article proposes a Layered Data Classification (LDC) model, which would categorize genetic information based on its risk level and impose stricter security measures accordingly. By analyzing these gaps, the article calls for urgent legal reforms to ensure genetic privacy is adequately protected in India’s evolving data protection landscape. Continue reading Protecting the Code of Life: Reimagining Data Privacy in the Age of Gene Editing

Interlocutory or Final?: Order of Pendente Lite Maintenance Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act- The Unresolved Conundrum

In this article, the author addresses and analyses the question whether a pendente lite maintenance order by a Family Court has the components of a final judgment/order thereby allowing an appeal against it or the said order is merely interlocutory, therefore should not be appealed. Different High Courts throughout the country have come up with contradictory interpretations and there is no clarity on the said issue till now. Through this article, the author tries to resolve the said conundrum and proposes what should be the correct approach based on the legislative intent. Continue reading Interlocutory or Final?: Order of Pendente Lite Maintenance Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act- The Unresolved Conundrum

From Commodity to Fundamental Right: Is Denial of Access to Electricity a Violation of Article 21?

In this article, the author examines the critical role of electricity in modern life and its evolving recognition as a Fundamental Right under the Indian Constitution. It explores the legislative and judicial developments that have transformed electricity from a taxable commodity to an essential service, culminating in its acknowledgment as a basic necessity under the Right to Shelter and Right to Life (Article 21). Through an analysis of key statutes and landmark judgments, the author argues for a rights-based approach to electricity access, emphasizing its indispensability in ensuring equal opportunities, socio-economic development, and a dignified standard of living for all citizens. Continue reading From Commodity to Fundamental Right: Is Denial of Access to Electricity a Violation of Article 21?

Behind the Lens of Drama: Who Truly Owns the Behind-the-Scenes Gold in Light of Dhanush v. Nayanthara – The Producer or the Camera Artist?

The author explores the ongoing copyright dispute between actor Nayanthara and producer Dhanush over a 3-second behind-the-scenes clip from Naanum Rowdy Dhaan used in Nayanthara’s Netflix docu-drama Nayanthara: Beyond the Fairytale. The central issue revolves around whether the producer or the individual capturing the footage owns such content, particularly when filmed on personal devices. By analyzing Indian copyright law, which defaults ownership to producers but allows exceptions, the author examines factors like contractual terms, fair use, and the de minimis principle. The case’s resolution, potentially hinging on whether the use is transformative or competitive, could set a critical precedent for copyright ownership in Indian cinema. Continue reading Behind the Lens of Drama: Who Truly Owns the Behind-the-Scenes Gold in Light of Dhanush v. Nayanthara – The Producer or the Camera Artist?

Extended | Call for Papers: RMLNLU Journal on Communication, Media, Entertainment & Technology Law [Volume 12]: Submit by 10th February, 2025

About RMLNLU Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University is an institute for law in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Dr. RMLNLU was established in the year 2005, and since then, has been providing undergraduate and post-graduate legal education. About the Journal Committee The Committee was constituted with the objective of promoting legal research and writing. Apart from conducting the RMLNLU International Legal Essay Writing Competition … Continue reading Extended | Call for Papers: RMLNLU Journal on Communication, Media, Entertainment & Technology Law [Volume 12]: Submit by 10th February, 2025

The Fallout of Hasty Deletion of Pious Obligation in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma & Ors (Part 2)

In this article, the author analyses the removal of the doctrine of pious obligation in the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 and exemplifies how well-intentioned legislation can falter due to poor drafting. Section 6(4) seeks to abolish this doctrine, but its accompanying proviso introduces ambiguities that the Supreme Court addressed in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma and Ors. Unfortunately, this resolution has further disadvantaged daughters rather than providing clarity. This analysis argues that the court’s interpretation of Section 6(4) misaligns with the legislature’s intent and outlines the serious implications of such a misinterpretation. Continue reading The Fallout of Hasty Deletion of Pious Obligation in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma & Ors (Part 2)

The Fallout of Hasty Deletion of Pious Obligation in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma & Ors (Part 1)

In this article, the author analyses the removal of the doctrine of pious obligation in the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 and exemplifies how well-intentioned legislation can falter due to poor drafting. Section 6(4) seeks to abolish this doctrine, but its accompanying proviso introduces ambiguities that the Supreme Court addressed in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma and Ors. Unfortunately, this resolution has further disadvantaged daughters rather than providing clarity. This analysis argues that the court’s interpretation of Section 6(4) misaligns with the legislature’s intent and outlines the serious implications of such a misinterpretation. Continue reading The Fallout of Hasty Deletion of Pious Obligation in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma & Ors (Part 1)