In this article, the author discusses the concept of “consent awards” in the context of arbitration proceedings in India. These awards are issued when parties in dispute agree to settle on specific terms, leading to the arbitral tribunal passing an award based on these agreed terms. He considers whether there should be an alternative procedure for challenging such awards, different from the procedure for challenging regular arbitral awards. While acknowledging the necessity of allowing some form of recourse against consent awards, the author argues for narrowing down the grounds for setting them aside. The author highlights recent developments, including a Delhi High Court judgment emphasizing the enforceability of foreign consent awards, and the establishment of an expert committee to reform arbitration laws. The ultimate goal is to minimize unnecessary judicial intervention, strengthen the enforcement of consent awards, and uphold the sanctity of settlements reached through arbitration. Continue reading Strengthening the Enforceability of Consent Awards in Arbitration: Rethinking Grounds for Set-Aside